Microplastics and Human Health: 15 Health Risks & How to Reduce Exposure

Plastic has become so deeply integrated into modern life that avoiding it completely is almost impossible. Food packaging, water bottles, synthetic clothing, household products, personal-care items, and countless everyday objects contain or are made from plastic. As these materials wear down, they can release extremely small particles known as microplastics.

That has raised an important question: What do microplastics mean for human health?

Scientists have now detected microplastic and nanoplastic particles in several human biological samples, including blood, placenta, gastrointestinal material, respiratory samples, and reproductive tissues. At the same time, researchers are still working to determine exactly what these particles do inside the body and which long-term health effects can genuinely be attributed to exposure. Recent human-focused reviews report associations with inflammatory, endocrine, oxidative-stress, cardiovascular, reproductive, gastrointestinal, and respiratory markers, but they also emphasize major limitations in exposure measurement and causal evidence.

So, should you panic about microplastics? No. But should you pay attention to unnecessary exposure? A practical, evidence-based approach makes sense.

This guide explains what microplastics are, how people encounter them, the 15 potential health risks being investigated, possible symptoms, what current research actually proves, and realistic ways to reduce exposure in everyday life.

Microplastics are a widespread source of human exposure, and researchers have detected these particles in several human biological samples. Studies are investigating possible links with inflammation, oxidative stress, endocrine signaling, reproductive health, digestive function, respiratory health, and cardiovascular outcomes. However, current evidence does not establish that everyday microplastic exposure causes a specific long list of diseases in humans. The most reasonable approach is to reduce unnecessary exposure while avoiding unproven “detox” claims or unnecessary fear.

Important: Microplastic research is rapidly evolving. Some health effects discussed below are supported mainly by laboratory or observational evidence rather than definitive proof that everyday microplastic exposure causes a particular disease in humans.

What Are Microplastics?

Microplastics are very small plastic particles generally described as particles smaller than 5 millimeters. Some are intentionally manufactured at small sizes, while others are created when larger plastic products gradually break apart because of sunlight, heat, friction, weathering, washing, and other environmental processes.

They can vary considerably in:

• Size

• Shape

• Polymer type

• Surface characteristics

• Chemical additives

• Environmental contaminants attached to them

Microplastics can also break down into even smaller particles called nanoplastics. Because nanoplastics are much smaller, scientists are particularly interested in whether they behave differently from larger microplastics and whether they can interact more readily with cells and biological barriers.

It is also important to remember that the health question is not necessarily about the plastic particle alone. Plastics may contain additives, and particles can interact with chemicals or biological material in their surroundings. The World Health Organization has identified these issues, along with major research gaps, as important areas for continued investigation.

How Do Microplastics Enter the Human Body?

Human exposure can happen through several everyday pathways. Researchers generally consider ingestion and inhalation important routes of exposure, while dermal exposure is also being investigated.

1. Food and Beverages

Microplastics have been reported in a wide variety of food and beverage samples. Potential sources include environmental contamination, processing equipment, packaging, and contact with plastic materials.

The presence of a particle in food, however, does not automatically mean that it will be absorbed into the body or cause disease. Dose, particle characteristics, exposure frequency, and biological behavior all matter.

2. Drinking Water

Both bottled and tap water can contain microplastic particles, although reported concentrations vary widely depending on sampling methods and analytical techniques.

WHO has reviewed microplastics in drinking water and emphasized the need for better monitoring and research because major uncertainties remain.

3. Air and Household Dust

Microplastics can become airborne through the breakdown or movement of plastic-containing materials. Indoor dust may contain fibers released from synthetic textiles, furnishings, and other products.

This means exposure is not limited to what people eat or drink. Breathing indoor air and accidentally swallowing contaminated dust may also contribute to overall exposure.

4. Food Packaging and Plastic Containers

Plastic packaging can be another potential source of particle exposure. Friction, aging, repeated use, and environmental conditions can influence particle release.

This is one reason many people choose to reduce unnecessary contact between hot foods and plastic containers, particularly when safer storage alternatives are readily available.

5. Synthetic Textiles

Polyester, nylon, acrylic, and other synthetic fabrics can release microscopic fibers during use and washing. Some of these fibers can enter household dust or wastewater.

Reducing unnecessary shedding is therefore a reasonable environmental and exposure-reduction strategy, although the exact health significance of inhaling or ingesting textile microfibers is still being studied.

Can Microplastics Enter the Bloodstream and Organs?

One of the most important developments in this field is that researchers have detected microplastic and nanoplastic particles in human biological samples.

Recent systematic reviews report findings involving blood, gastrointestinal samples, respiratory material, placental tissue, reproductive tissues, and other biological compartments. A 2026 systematic review of living-human studies found evidence of micro- and nanoplastics in multiple organ systems while emphasizing that differences in detection techniques and study design make causal conclusions difficult.

This distinction is crucial:

Detection does not automatically equal disease.

Finding a particle in a tissue tells scientists that exposure and biological distribution are possible. It does not, by itself, demonstrate that the particle caused a specific illness.

Researchers are now trying to answer several deeper questions:

• Which particle sizes are most biologically active?

• Which polymer types matter most?

• How long do particles remain in tissues?

• Can particles cross important biological barriers?

• What happens at realistic environmental exposure levels?

• Which effects are caused by the particle itself versus associated chemicals?

• Do repeated low-level exposures produce meaningful long-term effects?

These questions remain active areas of research.

15 Potential Health Risks of Microplastics

The following risks represent areas of scientific investigation. They should not be interpreted as a list of proven diseases caused by everyday microplastic exposure.

1. Inflammation

Inflammation is one of the most frequently discussed biological responses in microplastic research.

Recent human-focused research has reported associations between microplastic exposure and inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and other signaling molecules. Experimental research also suggests that particles can interact with immune cells and tissues.

However, inflammation is a general biological response with many possible causes. Therefore, finding an association between microplastics and an inflammatory marker does not prove that microplastics caused a person's disease.

Current evidence supports continued investigation rather than definitive claims of chronic inflammatory disease.

2. Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress occurs when the production of reactive molecules overwhelms the body's ability to maintain cellular balance.

Microplastic research has repeatedly investigated oxidative stress because laboratory studies suggest that certain particles can increase oxidative activity in cells and tissues.

Human-focused reviews have also identified oxidative-stress biomarkers among the outcomes being studied. Still, the strength of evidence varies, and laboratory concentrations may not represent typical real-world exposure.

In simple terms, oxidative stress is a possible biological pathway, not proof that microplastics inevitably cause cellular damage in every exposed person.

3. Gut Health and the Gut Microbiome

The digestive tract is one of the first places where ingested microplastics may interact with the body.

Researchers are studying whether particles can influence:

• Gut microbial diversity

• Intestinal barrier function

• Local inflammation

• Cellular signaling

• Digestive immune responses

Human studies have reported associations between micro- and nanoplastic measurements and changes in gut-related markers, but evidence remains heterogeneous.

A healthy gut microbiome is influenced by diet, medications, stress, infections, age, sleep, and many other factors. Therefore, microplastics should not be considered the sole explanation for changes in gut health.

4. Digestive System Effects

Beyond the microbiome, scientists are examining whether microplastics may affect the intestinal lining and digestive tissues.

A rapid systematic review found evidence suggesting potential digestive effects in experimental studies, including inflammation and changes in intestinal tissue. The review also noted that human evidence remains limited compared with animal evidence.

Possible biological concerns include altered barrier function and local inflammatory responses.

More long-term human studies are needed before researchers can determine how important these effects are at ordinary environmental exposure levels.

5. Hormonal and Endocrine Effects

Some plastics contain chemicals capable of interacting with hormone-related biological pathways. This has made endocrine effects an important area of research.

Recent human evidence has reported associations involving endocrine markers, including thyroid hormones and cortisol, although these findings do not establish that microplastics directly caused hormonal disorders.

This subject is particularly complicated because the term “plastic exposure” can refer to several different exposures, including particles, additives, and other chemicals.

Therefore, future research needs to separate the effects of the physical particles from the effects of chemicals associated with plastic materials.

6. Reproductive Health

Reproductive health is another major research area.

A systematic review of human reproductive evidence found microplastics in placental and meconium samples and identified limited studies examining associations with reproductive outcomes. The authors emphasized the need for better-quality observational research.

Recent human-focused reviews have also reported associations involving semen quality and reproductive tissues, although exposure measurement and confounding remain important limitations.

Animal and laboratory research provides additional biological clues, but those findings should not automatically be presented as established human outcomes.

7. Pregnancy and Placental Health

The discovery of microplastics in placental and related reproductive samples has generated significant scientific interest.

A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis examined female reproductive health and pregnancy outcomes and reported microplastic detection in samples including placenta, meconium, amniotic fluid, and feces. However, the underlying evidence remains an evolving field, and researchers continue to investigate whether exposure translates into clinically meaningful pregnancy effects.

Pregnancy is a period when avoiding unnecessary environmental exposures is generally sensible, but readers should not interpret current research as proof that ordinary microplastic exposure causes pregnancy complications.

8. Cardiovascular Health

Cardiovascular research has become one of the most closely watched areas of microplastic science.

A 2026 systematic review reported that several human studies have examined micro- and nanoplastic burdens in cardiovascular settings and found associations with inflammatory markers and adverse cardiac outcomes. However, the review also identified substantial concerns involving confounding and exposure-measurement bias.

This is important because cardiovascular disease has many established risk factors, including smoking, high blood pressure, diabetes, cholesterol abnormalities, inactivity, diet, age, and genetics.

Microplastics should therefore be viewed as an emerging research question—not a replacement explanation for known cardiovascular risks.

9. Respiratory Health

Inhalation is a plausible route of exposure, particularly for airborne fibers and household dust.

Researchers are investigating whether inhaled particles can contribute to:

• Airway inflammation

• Oxidative stress

• Lung irritation

• Changes in pulmonary function

A rapid systematic review found experimental evidence suggesting respiratory effects, including inflammation, oxidative stress, and lung injury, while acknowledging the limitations of available human research.

Good indoor ventilation and regular dust control are practical steps that may reduce exposure to many airborne pollutants—not only microplastics.

10. Potential Effects on Liver Health

The liver plays a central role in metabolism, detoxification, and chemical processing, making it an important organ for environmental-health research.

Recent human studies have investigated associations between micro- and nanoplastic measurements and liver-related markers. A 2026 review reported associations involving liver enzymes in gastrointestinal research, while also emphasizing the limitations of available evidence.

Animal and cellular studies have proposed mechanisms involving oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered metabolism.

More longitudinal human research is needed before the clinical importance of these observations can be determined.

11. Potential Effects on Kidney Health

The kidneys continuously filter blood and regulate fluid and electrolyte balance, so researchers are also investigating whether persistent exposure to environmental particles could affect renal function.

Potential mechanisms discussed in experimental research include inflammation, oxidative stress, cellular injury, and changes in tissue function.

However, direct evidence that everyday microplastic exposure causes kidney disease in humans remains insufficient. Existing research is better described as an emerging area of concern rather than a confirmed clinical risk.

12. Potential Effects on the Brain and Nervous System

The possibility that very small plastic particles could interact with the nervous system has attracted considerable research attention.

Nanoplastics are especially interesting because their extremely small size may give them different biological properties from larger particles.

Laboratory studies have investigated neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, cellular signaling, and other neurological mechanisms. Human evidence, however, remains much less developed.

A recent human-focused systematic review described neurocognitive and chronic-disease evidence as limited and inconsistent.

For now, claims that microplastics directly cause dementia, depression, or other neurological diseases would go beyond the available evidence.

13. Immune System Effects

The immune system may respond to foreign particles through several pathways.

Microplastic research has examined immune-cell activation, inflammation, altered immune signaling, and potential immune suppression. A systematic review found experimental evidence suggesting possible effects on digestive immune responses, while human evidence remains comparatively limited.

The immune system is highly complex, and its responses depend on particle characteristics, exposure levels, genetics, existing health conditions, and many environmental factors.

More standardized human studies are needed to understand whether ordinary environmental exposure has clinically meaningful immune consequences.

14. Skin Health

Skin is another possible route of contact, particularly through cosmetics, household products, occupational exposure, and plastic-containing materials.

The outer skin barrier provides substantial protection, and not every particle that touches the skin will penetrate it.

Researchers are nevertheless studying whether certain particle sizes or formulations can interact with skin cells and contribute to irritation or inflammatory responses.

At present, evidence for major systemic health effects from ordinary skin contact with microplastics is considerably less established than the evidence surrounding ingestion and inhalation.

15. Cellular Damage and Long-Term Disease Risk

One of the broadest concerns is whether repeated exposure could contribute to cellular changes over many years.

Laboratory research has examined:

• Oxidative stress

• DNA damage

• Mitochondrial dysfunction

• Inflammation

• Cell death

• Altered cellular signaling

A 2025 review of potential disease risks discussed possible links with metabolic, respiratory, cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, liver, kidney, skin, cancer, and ageing-related disorders. However, the same review emphasized that robust direct evidence connecting everyday microplastic exposure to human disease remains scarce.

This distinction should remain at the center of any responsible discussion of microplastics and human health.

What Symptoms Might Be Linked to Microplastic Exposure?

One of the most common questions people ask is: “What are the symptoms of microplastic exposure?”

The honest answer is that there is currently no medically established symptom checklist that can diagnose microplastic exposure.

Some research has examined nonspecific biological or health outcomes involving inflammation, respiratory function, reproductive markers, digestive health, or other systems. But symptoms such as fatigue, stomach discomfort, headaches, coughing, or skin irritation can have dozens of unrelated causes.

Therefore:

A symptom alone cannot tell you that microplastics are responsible.

If you have persistent digestive, respiratory, cardiovascular, reproductive, neurological, or other concerning symptoms, the appropriate approach is to discuss them with a qualified healthcare professional rather than trying to self-diagnose microplastic toxicity.

What Does Science Actually Prove About Microplastics?

This may be the most important section of the entire article.

What We Know

Researchers have documented human exposure to microplastics and have detected particles in multiple human biological samples.

What Research Suggests

Human and experimental studies suggest possible relationships involving inflammation, oxidative stress, endocrine signaling, reproductive health, digestive function, respiratory health, and cardiovascular outcomes.

What Is Still Uncertain

Scientists still need better answers about:

• Long-term exposure

• Real-world doses

• Particle size and shape

• Polymer-specific effects

• Nanoplastics

• Individual susceptibility

• Interactions with plastic additives

• Disease causation

The newest human evidence is therefore best described as important but still developing.

This is also why reputable health information should avoid headlines claiming that microplastics have already been proven to cause a long list of diseases.

How to Reduce Microplastic Exposure in Everyday Life

Completely eliminating microplastic exposure is unrealistic. The goal should be reasonable exposure reduction, not fear or perfection.

1. Reduce Unnecessary Single-Use Plastics

Choose reusable options when they are practical and safe.

Reducing disposable plastic can lower your contact with plastic products while also reducing environmental plastic waste.

2. Avoid Unnecessary Heating of Food in Plastic

Heat can change the interaction between food and packaging materials. When convenient, use appropriate glass, ceramic, or other suitable food-storage options for hot foods.

Always follow the manufacturer's instructions for containers designed for food use.

3. Store Food Properly

Use containers intended for food storage and replace damaged, heavily scratched, or deteriorating plastic containers when appropriate.

The goal is not to throw away every plastic item in your home. Instead, focus on sensible choices and avoid unnecessary wear and misuse.

4. Reduce Unnecessary Plastic-Packaged Foods

When practical, choose foods with less packaging.

This can be especially easy with fresh fruits, vegetables, grains, and other foods that are available without excessive packaging.

5. Keep Indoor Dust Under Control

Regular cleaning can reduce household dust, which may contain synthetic fibers and other pollutants.

Vacuuming appropriately, cleaning surfaces, and maintaining ventilation can help improve overall indoor environmental quality.

6. Improve Indoor Ventilation

Fresh-air circulation can help manage airborne particles and other indoor pollutants.

If outdoor air quality is poor, however, ventilation choices should be adapted to local conditions.

7. Wash Hands Before Eating

Handwashing is a simple public-health habit that reduces exposure to many contaminants.

It is not a “microplastic detox,” but it can reduce the amount of dust and particles transferred from surfaces to food.

8. Be Mindful of Synthetic Textile Shedding

Washing synthetic clothing can release fibers. Following garment-care instructions and avoiding unnecessary washing or excessive abrasion may help reduce fiber shedding.

9. Maintain Reusable Containers

Reusable products should be cleaned properly and replaced when they become damaged or excessively worn.

A reusable container is useful only when it is maintained appropriately.

10. Focus on Practical Risk Reduction

You do not need to become afraid of every plastic product.

A balanced strategy is more realistic:

Reduce unnecessary exposure where it is easy to do so, while continuing normal healthy habits such as eating a balanced diet, exercising, sleeping adequately, avoiding tobacco, and following established medical advice.

Microplastic reduction should complement—not replace—proven health behaviors.

Microplastics in Food, Water, and Air

Exposure source	How exposure may occur	Current understanding
Food	Eating contaminated food or contact with packaging	Human exposure is documented
Drinking water	Ingestion of particles in water	Microplastics have been detected in bottled and tap water
Air	Inhalation of airborne particles and fibers	An important research pathway
Household dust	Inhalation or accidental ingestion	May contribute to overall exposure
Packaging	Contact with plastic materials	Potential source
Synthetic textiles	Release of microscopic fibers	Exposure pathway under investigation

WHO has reviewed microplastic exposure through food, water, and air and has highlighted substantial research gaps.

Are Bottled Water and Plastic Containers a Major Concern?

Bottled water has received considerable attention because studies have detected microplastics in bottled-water samples.

However, it would be misleading to say that bottled water is automatically dangerous because it contains detectable particles.

The important questions are:

• How many particles are present?

• What size are they?

• What polymer are they made from?

• How much is actually absorbed?

• What is the health effect at realistic exposure levels?

WHO's work on drinking-water microplastics has emphasized uncertainties in measurement, exposure, and health risk assessment rather than presenting microplastics as a confirmed major cause of disease.

If you want to reduce unnecessary plastic contact, using suitable reusable food and beverage containers is a reasonable practical step.

Microplastics vs. Nanoplastics: Which Is More Concerning?

The basic difference is size.

Microplastics are generally defined as particles smaller than 5 millimeters, while nanoplastics are much smaller and are often discussed at the nanometer scale.

Their smaller size may allow nanoplastics to interact differently with cells and biological barriers.

This does not automatically mean that every nanoplastic is more dangerous than every microplastic. Toxicity can depend on particle size, shape, polymer type, surface chemistry, concentration, and exposure route.

Scientists are particularly interested in nanoplastics because current analytical techniques may have difficulty detecting and characterizing the smallest particles consistently.

As detection technology improves, our understanding of human exposure may also change.

Who May Need Extra Attention?

Researchers are particularly interested in exposure during certain life stages and in populations with potentially higher environmental exposure.

These include:

Pregnant People

Because pregnancy involves major biological changes and fetal development, researchers are studying placental and fetal exposure carefully. Current evidence is not strong enough to claim that ordinary microplastic exposure causes specific pregnancy complications.

Infants and Children

Children may have different exposure patterns and developing biological systems. However, the exact clinical significance of microplastic exposure in children remains an important research gap.

People With Occupational Exposure

Workers who handle plastic materials, synthetic fibers, or environments with substantial airborne particles may experience different exposure levels from the general population.

Workplace safety practices should therefore remain the primary protection strategy.

How to Reduce Microplastic Exposure in Everyday Life

If you want a quick starting point, focus on these practical habits:

1. Reduce unnecessary single-use plastics.

2. Avoid unnecessarily heating food in plastic.

3. Use appropriate food-storage containers.

4. Reduce excessive plastic packaging when practical.

5. Keep indoor dust under control.

6. Maintain good indoor ventilation when conditions allow.

7. Wash hands before meals.

8. Reduce unnecessary wear and shedding of synthetic textiles.

9. Replace badly damaged food containers.

10. Focus on realistic exposure reduction rather than trying to achieve zero exposure.

These steps are practical because they do not require completely changing your lifestyle.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are microplastics?

Microplastics are very small plastic particles, generally defined as particles smaller than 5 millimeters. They can originate from intentionally produced small particles or from the breakdown of larger plastic products.

How do microplastics affect human health?

Research is investigating possible effects involving inflammation, oxidative stress, endocrine signaling, reproductive health, digestive function, respiratory health, and cardiovascular systems. However, many specific disease relationships remain unproven in humans.

Can microplastics enter the bloodstream?

Researchers have detected micro- and nanoplastic particles in human blood and other biological samples. Detection demonstrates exposure and distribution, but it does not by itself prove that the particles cause disease.

Can microplastics cause cancer?

There is scientific concern about possible biological pathways related to inflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular damage, and researchers are investigating potential cancer-related risks. However, it would be inaccurate to state that ordinary microplastic exposure has been conclusively proven to cause cancer in humans.

Can microplastics affect hormones?

Hormonal and endocrine effects are being studied, and recent human research has reported associations involving certain endocrine biomarkers. These findings do not establish that microplastics directly cause hormonal disease.

Can microplastics affect fertility?

Reproductive health is an active research area. Human studies have reported microplastic detection in reproductive tissues and associations with some reproductive markers, but researchers still need larger and better-designed studies to establish causation.

Are microplastics found in human blood?

Yes. Multiple studies have reported micro- and nanoplastic particles in human blood or blood-related samples. Researchers are still investigating what particle burden means for long-term health.

What foods contain microplastics?

Microplastics have been reported in various food categories, including seafood, salt, packaged foods, and other products. However, concentrations vary significantly between studies, and detection does not automatically indicate a clinically significant health risk.

Does bottled water contain microplastics?

Studies have detected microplastics in bottled water as well as other water sources. WHO has identified microplastic exposure through drinking water as an area requiring continued monitoring and research.

Can you remove microplastics from your body?

There is currently not clinically established “microplastic detox” treatment that has been proven to remove microplastics from the human body. Be cautious of supplements, cleanses, or detox programs marketed specifically for microplastic removal.

How can I reduce microplastic exposure?

Start with practical steps such as reducing unnecessary single-use plastics, avoiding unnecessary heating of food in plastic, controlling household dust, maintaining reusable containers, and reducing excessive synthetic-fiber exposure.

Are microplastics dangerous to children?

Children are an important area of research because of their developing bodies and different exposure patterns. However, current evidence is not sufficient to define a specific level of microplastic exposure that causes disease in children.

Are nanoplastics more dangerous than microplastics?

Nanoplastics may behave differently because of their much smaller size, but “smaller” does not automatically mean “more dangerous” in every situation. Their health effects remain under active investigation.

Is there a test for microplastic exposure?

There is currently no routine clinical test that healthcare professionals use to diagnose a person's overall “microplastic toxicity.” Research laboratories can analyze biological samples for plastic particles, but these techniques are not equivalent to a standard diagnostic test for disease.

The Bottom Line

Microplastics are now an unavoidable part of the modern environmental landscape, and evidence shows that humans are exposed to them through pathways including food, water, and air.

Researchers have also detected micro- and nanoplastic particles in multiple human biological samples. Newer human studies are investigating associations with inflammation, oxidative stress, endocrine markers, reproductive health, cardiovascular outcomes, gastrointestinal changes, and respiratory effects.

But there is an equally important part of the story:

Science has not yet established that everyday microplastic exposure causes a specific long list of diseases in humans.

The evidence is complicated by differences in particle types, exposure levels, detection methods, study designs, and potential confounding factors. Recent reviews repeatedly call for larger longitudinal studies, standardized measurement methods, and better exposure assessment.

For individuals, the most sensible approach is neither panic nor complete dismissal.

Reduce unnecessary exposure where it is practical. Avoid excessive heating or misuse of plastic food containers. Keep indoor environments reasonably clean. Reduce unnecessary single-use plastic and synthetic-fiber exposure. And most importantly, continue to prioritize established health behaviors such as a balanced diet, regular physical activity, adequate sleep, avoiding tobacco, and appropriate medical care.

Microplastic research is moving quickly. As scientists develop better ways to detect, measure, and track these particles, the picture of microplastics and human health will become clearer.

For now, informed and practical exposure reduction is a reasonable choice—without turning an evolving scientific question into unnecessary fear.

Medical Disclaimer

This article is intended for general educational and informational purposes only. It does not diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional. Microplastic research is evolving, and scientific conclusions may change as higher-quality human evidence becomes available.

Recommended Reading:

How to Increase Energy Levels Naturally: 12 Simple Ways to Boost Energy and Beat Fatigue

Vitamin B12 Deficiency in India: Symptoms, Causes, Tests, Treatment & Diet

Strawberries: Health Benefits, Nutrition, Uses & Side Effects — Complete Guide